Will Environmental Justice Mean an Equally Lousy Environment for All?

The environmental justice movement, sparked by activism in low-income communities of color, brought national attention to the problem of disparate siting of pollution and hazardous waste. The EJ movement grew to take on broader issues of inequality with respect to distribution of environmental harms and access to environmental benefits, and also breathed new life into mainstream environmentalism. By challenging the “top ten” mainstream environmental groups to see environmental issues through a lens of equity and justice, the EJ movement had the potential to unite social justice and environmental issues in ways that would make them more compelling to more people, and likelier to result in an egalitarian and environmentally sustainable world.  (The Natural Resources Defense Council has a very good and concise history of the EJ movement here.)  At least that was the hope.

But that hope depends on making progress on all fronts. Are we? At the moment, the most optimistic answer might be “it’s hard to tell.” On the EJ front, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) just announced an exciting new initiative on Environmental Justice,  Plan EJ 2014.  The Plan aims to incorporate EJ concerns throughout all governmental decision-making, and to make a priority of empowering communities to improve their own health and environments.  This sounds promising, and is an important step towards further normalizing the EJ values embraced in President Clinton’s EJ Executive Order.

And yet, what kind of environments will minority, low-income, and American Indian tribal communities have to sustain and protect?  In terms of environmental protection generally, trends seem to be heading in the wrong direction.  While we are a far cry from the pre-Earth Day world of regulatory free-for-all, when industry could emit pollutants into the air and dump sludge into the rivers with little oversight, the political appetite for addressing our most serious environmental problems is small indeed. To name just a few examples, national climate legislation of any kind is off the table until at least 2013.  Nearly all of the Republican candidates in the presidential race are trying to outdo each other with respect to how much they loathe the EPA. And the Obama Administration has, at the very least, de-prioritized progress on environmental protection, including a recent decision to delay yet again EPA regulations that would limit greenhouse gas emissions from stationary sources.

So while equality, in any circumstances, is better than inequality, environmental equity in a throughly degraded environment hardly seems just.   The EJ movement has made an enormous impression on environmentalism, but its aspirations will not be realized if environmentalism fails to make a bigger, broader and more equitable impression on our political leaders.

This entry was posted in Nature/Culture, Politics and tagged , , . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Will Environmental Justice Mean an Equally Lousy Environment for All?

  1. Patty Salkin says:

    Sarah, while I agree that the environment is in need of a lot of help, the fact remains that many of us live and work daily in areas of our communities where the air is cleaner and where there are far less public health impacts to confront every hour thank those with less means. The EJ movement is about the future for sure, but it is also about addressing dire situations in communities where low income and minority individuals and tribal members are dying in disproportionate numbers because of the unfair and inequitable environmental and land use decisions of the past (and sadly, in many cases, the present). As a member of the National Environmental Justice Advisory Council, representing the academic community, I sit at NEJAC meetings and listen to the testimony of people whose family, friends and neighbors are diagnosed with cancer and other ailments, and/or who are born with various birth defects because of the environment in which they live, and I can’t help but believe that we cannot focus just on the future until we clean up the past and present. The good news is that today many EJ communities are stronger, better organized and well trained, and their advocacy is much more sophisticated both in terms of application and explanation of the underlying science and in terms of messaging to policymakers. I have observed a growing awareness and strength in advocay by youth from EJ communities, and this has given me hope for a brighter tomorrow.

    • Sarah Krakoff says:

      Thanks Patty. Your point is very important, and I agree with everything you say. One of the brightest spots on the environmental horizon is the passionate and savvy advocacy happening within communities that were left behind by the US environmental movement’s initial progress. As you note, I am looking ahead and wondering what the future holds, and hoping (in utopian fashion) that EJ activists and communities are rewarded with *even more* than an end to the terrible disparate impacts on low-income and minority communities that exist today, and throughout the world. I hope they are rewarded with a sustainable planet that their children and grandchildren can tend and enjoy. But achieving that first end, as you note, is crucial.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s